OCEAN to Compensate Miners After Hash Rate Diverted to BIP-110 Chain for 18 Hours

By admin On Aug 10, 2026

Bitcoin mining pool OCEAN has acknowledged that a portion of its miners’ hash rate was unintentionally directed to the BIP-110 chain for approximately 18 hours, and the pool has committed to compensating affected users. The incident, which was first reported by Bitcoin News, has drawn sharp criticism from some miners who claim the pool effectively diverted customer hash rate to support the struggling BIP-110 chain without prior consent.

What Happened and How OCEAN Is Responding

OCEAN, known for its focus on transparent and decentralized mining practices, said the misdirection occurred due to a configuration error that caused the pool’s default connection settings to route hash rate to the BIP-110 chain. The pool has since restored the default connection to the legacy Bitcoin chain, and miners can now manually choose between the legacy chain and the BIP-110 chain.

To make amends, OCEAN plans to pay affected miners approximately 0.3 $BTC, based on the returns they would have reasonably expected from mining on the legacy Bitcoin chain during the 18-hour period. The compensation is intended to cover the difference in earnings, as the BIP-110 chain is less profitable due to lower transaction fees and reduced block rewards.

What Is the BIP-110 Chain?

BIP-110 is a proposed temporary soft fork that aims to limit non-payment data embedded in Bitcoin transactions. The proposal seeks to reduce the use of inscriptions and Runes, which have contributed to blockchain bloat and increased node resource requirements. By restricting such data, BIP-110 aims to ease the burden on node operators and improve overall network efficiency.

The chain is considered ‘struggling’ by some observers, as it has lower hash rate and adoption compared to the legacy chain. This incident highlights the operational risks when mining pools experiment with alternative chains or configurations, especially without clear communication to their users.

Why This Matters to Miners and the Bitcoin Ecosystem

For miners, the incident underscores the importance of transparency and control over where their hash rate is directed. Mining pools act as intermediaries, and any misallocation can have direct financial consequences for participants. The compensation offer by OCEAN is a step toward rebuilding trust, but the criticism from miners indicates that clearer safeguards and communication protocols are needed.

MARA Holdings Offloads $1.6B in Bitcoin During H1, Trims…

admin Aug 10, 2026 0

This bitcoin miner rejected BIP-110 despite mining through a…

admin Aug 10, 2026 0

For the broader Bitcoin ecosystem, the event brings attention to ongoing debates about network scalability and the role of soft forks like BIP-110. While the proposal has its supporters, this incident may prompt more careful consideration of how such changes are implemented and tested in real-world mining environments.

Conclusion

OCEAN’s acknowledgment and compensation plan are positive steps, but the incident serves as a reminder of the operational complexities in Bitcoin mining. As the network evolves, ensuring that miners retain control over their hash rate and are fully informed of configuration changes will be critical to maintaining trust in mining pools and the broader ecosystem.

FAQs

Q1: What exactly caused the hash rate to be routed to the BIP-110 chain?
OCEAN said it was a configuration error that changed the default connection settings, directing hash rate to the BIP-110 chain for about 18 hours. The pool has since corrected the default to the legacy chain.

Q2: How much compensation will affected miners receive?
OCEAN plans to pay approximately 0.3 $BTC per affected miner, based on the expected returns from mining on the legacy Bitcoin chain during the incident period.

Q3: What is the BIP-110 chain and why is it controversial?
BIP-110 is a proposed temporary soft fork that limits non-payment data in Bitcoin transactions, reducing inscriptions and Runes. It is controversial because it alters transaction rules and has lower adoption and hash rate compared to the legacy chain.